BulldogTom Posted February 12, 2011 Report Posted February 12, 2011 Clents got married last year. He has house, she has house. They move into his house and start renting her house 1/1/10. Renters trash the place and move out 8/15. They fix her house back up and decide to move into it. His house is empty now. They should get the 8 months of depreciation on the home for the period of rental. Shouldn't they? How do I make ATX give them that amount and then convert it to a personal residence again? I am away from my office without research material. Thanks Tom Lodi, CA (but in Fresno today) Quote
BulldogTom Posted February 12, 2011 Author Report Posted February 12, 2011 Never mind. I got it. Tom Lodi, CA (but in Fresno today) Quote
Lynn EA USTCP in Louisiana Posted February 13, 2011 Report Posted February 13, 2011 Never mind. I got it. Tom Lodi, CA (but in Fresno today) Tom, for those of us who don't know the answer to your question, would you tell us what you figured out? Thanks, Lynn Lynn Jacobs, EA, NP Kenner, La Quote
Ranger Posted February 13, 2011 Report Posted February 13, 2011 For an asset placed and taken out of service in the same year, I believe the depreciation equals zero. Quote
Lynn EA USTCP in Louisiana Posted February 13, 2011 Report Posted February 13, 2011 For an asset placed and taken out of service in the same year, I believe the depreciation equals zero. Hi Ranger, that part I am well aware of. I just wondered if Tom had found another solution to his dilemma. Thanks, Lynn Lynn Jacobs, EA, FNTPI, NP Kenner, LA Quote
Ranger Posted February 14, 2011 Report Posted February 14, 2011 As I understand it, the house was placed in service and taken out of service in the same the year. So the program correctly disallowed depreciation. Quote
kcjenkins Posted February 14, 2011 Report Posted February 14, 2011 True for personal property, but not for res rental property. Look at Pub 946, the Section on Sale or other Disposition before the recovery period ends. Quote
BulldogTom Posted February 14, 2011 Author Report Posted February 14, 2011 Hi Ranger, that part I am well aware of. I just wondered if Tom had found another solution to his dilemma. Thanks, Lynn Lynn Jacobs, EA, FNTPI, NP Kenner, LA I finally decided to follow the program and went to the disposition tab and filled it out correctly using the proper dates and the program did it for me. Adjusted the depreciation to the right amount and put it on the Sch E. Did not report on the 1040 as a sale. Sometimes you just need to stop trying to out think the software. It is kinda embarrassing that I even posted this. Tom Lodi, CA Quote
kcjenkins Posted February 14, 2011 Report Posted February 14, 2011 Yeah, and we always feel silly when we try to force it do something, only to realize later that the program would have done it for us with much less effort! Those of us who started out doing returns by hand with just a ten-key are the most prone to that, I expect. Quote
Ranger Posted February 15, 2011 Report Posted February 15, 2011 KC, can you point out the section you referred to? Page six of pub 946 say “property placed in service and disposed in the same year.” It makes no distinction between real and personal property. Pub 946, page six: “Even if the requirements explained in the preceding discussions are met, you cannot depreciate the following property. Property placed in service and disposed of in the same year….” Quote
kcjenkins Posted February 15, 2011 Report Posted February 15, 2011 Ranger, that Pub does not cite a Code section for one good reason, there is no such section to cite. Here is a good discussion of the subject, which I found very interesting. The author takes the position that the Code does not prohibit it for any property. And since the only reference found was to the "40% rule" and Real Estate is specifically exempted from the "40% rule", that tends to support my position, IMHO. http://tinyurl.com/4ueh5rn Years ago, I searched Tax Court rulings on this subject, and found something indicating that the court had allowed deprciation on real estate bought and sold in the same year, but I don't remember where I found it, and don't have the time to look for it again. I do, however, know that most professional tax software does not calculate it for personal property, but does for real estate, which I presume rests on the same basis as what I found years ago. Quote
LindaB Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 Real property uses mid-month convention and personal property uses half-year convention, I think this figures into it. Quote
DANRVAN Posted February 16, 2011 Report Posted February 16, 2011 The 2009 CCH Master Depreciation Guide discusses this issue on pages 289 and 290. They refer to Reg. Section 1.168(i)-4©, which states about halfway through: “No depreciation deduction is allowable for MACRS property placed in service and disposed of in the same taxable year.” It appears the statement in Pub 946 comes from the Reg. The CCH Master Depreciation author notes that in the past depreciation was allowed for real property placed in service and disposed in the same year. PS: I don't know how those "faces" ended up in the reg posting below! *************************** Reg. Section 1.168(i)-4© Changes in use © Conversion to personal use. The conversion of MACRS property from business or income-producing use to personal use during a taxable year is treated as a disposition of the property in that taxable year. The depreciation allowance for MACRS property for the year of change in which the property is treated as being disposed of is determined by first multiplying the adjusted depreciable basis of the property as of the first day of the year of change by the applicable depreciation rate for that taxable year (for further guidance, for example, see section 6 of Rev. Proc. 87-57 (1987-2 C. B. 687, 692) (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(B ) of this chapter)). This amount is then multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months (including fractions of months) the property is deemed to be placed in service during the year of change (taking into account the applicable convention) and the denominator of which is 12. No depreciation deduction is allowable for MACRS property placed in service and disposed of in the same taxable year. See §§ 1.168(k)-1T(f)(6)(ii) and 1.1400L(B )-1T(f)(6) for the additional first year depreciation deduction rules applicable to property placed in service and converted to personal use in the same taxable year. Upon the conversion to personal use, no gain, loss, or depreciation recapture under section 1245 or section 1250 is recognized. However, the provisions of section 1245 or section 1250 apply to any disposition of the converted property by the taxpayer at a later date. For listed property (as defined in section 280F(d)(4)), see section 280F(B )(2) for the recapture of excess depreciation upon the conversion to personal use. Quote
kcjenkins Posted February 17, 2011 Report Posted February 17, 2011 The emoticons showed up because the emoticon is made by typing a capital B followed by a ). So when typing a cite that uses a capital B, you need to insert a space after the B, or else you need to turn off the emoticons entirely. PS, I removed them for you by inserting the space for you. Quote
carolynm Posted February 17, 2011 Report Posted February 17, 2011 Can I chime in here on the asset bought sold same year depreciation topic? Yesterday I was doing a 1065 -they bought & sold a racehorse in 2010. ATX is calculating depreciation on this asset - I didn't think it should and have overridden it. Is there something I'm missing? Quote
jainen Posted February 18, 2011 Report Posted February 18, 2011 >>asset bought sold same year<< According to Pub 946, "To be depreciable, property must have a useful life that extends substantially beyond the year you place it in service." Quickfinder says baldly, "No depreciatiation deduction is allowed for property placed in service and disposed of in the same year." (Quickfinder says property converted to personal use is treated as a disposition for calculating MACRS, though recapture doesn't apply until it is actually sold or junked.) There are special rules for ACRS property, like kind exchanges, and involuntary conversions. Quote
carolynm Posted February 19, 2011 Report Posted February 19, 2011 Then I guess I need to report this to ATX...it's a glitch in the 1065 program. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.