Oh Baby! Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 Individual sells property A for $100 (and let's for simplicity just say a $100 gain). Individual takes the proceeds and purchases property B for $300 together with a partner. The original individual contributes $200 for a 66% ownership of the Property B and the new partner contributes $100 for a 33% share of the new property. Ordinarily, I would reduce the depreciable basis of the new property by the amount of the deferred gain. but I cannot do that here or else the new partner will show a much larger gain when the new property is sold. what i want to do is to reduce the equity basis of the original partner and make no adjustment to the value of the property. Is this correct or is there a different way to do this? As always....thanks in advance for your help! Quote
Bart Posted August 5, 2010 Report Posted August 5, 2010 Individual sells property A for $100 (and let's for simplicity just say a $100 gain). Individual takes the proceeds and purchases property B for $300 together with a partner. The original individual contributes $200 for a 66% ownership of the Property B and the new partner contributes $100 for a 33% share of the new property. Ordinarily, I would reduce the depreciable basis of the new property by the amount of the deferred gain. but I cannot do that here or else the new partner will show a much larger gain when the new property is sold. what i want to do is to reduce the equity basis of the original partner and make no adjustment to the value of the property. Is this correct or is there a different way to do this? As always....thanks in advance for your help! Sounds to me like the individual sold a property and bought an interest in a partnership. That is not like-kind. Quote
jainen Posted August 6, 2010 Report Posted August 6, 2010 >>the new partner will show a much larger gain when the new property is sold<< What's that got to do with the original individual? His basis is whatever it is. But if he "sold" the old property and "bought" new property with a "partner," Section 1031 is irrelevant anyway. Generally I do like to keep discussing 1031, but I do get tired of putting those three words in quotes. Quote
michaelmars Posted August 6, 2010 Report Posted August 6, 2010 jainen is right but if you have a case where different partners have different deprciable basis just set up the asset as 2 buildings for each partner and/or with deprciable basis and nondepr basis. this will just be a work around so that the program calculates the depr and you don't need outside worksheets. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.