Pacun Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Are these companies required to fill out Schedule L in form 1120: Company A: Gross receipts: $350K Assets $100K. Company B: Gross receipts: $200K Assets: $100K Company C. Gross receipts 100K Assets: $500K. Quote
Lion EA Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 Form 1120 (2024) Page 5 Schedule K Other Information (continued from page 4) 13 Are the corporation’s total receipts (page 1, line 1a, plus lines 4 through 10) for the tax year and its total assets at the end of the tax year less than $250,000? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes No If “Yes,” the corporation is not required to complete Schedules L, M-1, and M-2. Instead, enter the total amount of cash distributions and the book value of property distributions (other than cash) made during this tax year $____________________ 2 Quote
Pacun Posted April 7 Author Report Posted April 7 The reason, I am asking is because someone said that both conditions must be meet. AND the way he was explaining it sounded that more that $250 in receipts AND more than $250 in assets for the condition to be meat. The way I understood (before his explanation) was that if the sum of both above $250K would require Sch L. Please fill free to answer examples A, B and C above. Quote
jklcpa Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 None of the examples in the original post would need to include Schs L, M-1, or M-2. Your friend is correct. Both components must be over $250K to require the schedules. The test is NOT with them added together. 3 Quote
Abby Normal Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 I would NEVER do a return without Sch L because it proves that the return is in balance. 4 Quote
Lee B Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 25 minutes ago, Abby Normal said: I would NEVER do a return without Sch L because it proves that the return is in balance. I totally agree with the exception of small partnership returns. 2 Quote
jasdlm Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Abby Normal said: I would NEVER do a return without Sch L because it proves that the return is in balance. 100% agree. Every corporate/partnership I do goes with Schedule L. Quote
jklcpa Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 1 hour ago, Abby Normal said: I would NEVER do a return without Sch L because it proves that the return is in balance. I agree with you. In the cases where not required, the returns are filed without those schedules, but I do prepare and print the Schs L, M-1, and M-2 for my file. That time is minimal, and excluding from the efile is a matter of unchecked a box. 4 Quote
BrewOne Posted April 7 Report Posted April 7 I stopped including with the return when ATX stopped allowing me to fill it out without having to say (lie) that the form was required. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.