JohnH Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 I know discussing upcoming legislation is often an exercise in futility, but here's an interesting take on how filing early this year MIGHT be problematic for some people. (If you don't mind clicking a link) It applies to those taxpayers fortunate enough to have experienced an INCREASE in income in 2020 over 2019. Just wondering if anyone else has run across anything along these lines? https://currently.att.yahoo.com/att/lose-1-400-stimulus-check-210600457.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=1_11 1 Quote
Medlin Software, Dennis Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 Timing is always an issue to be reviewed. In the case of the EIP's, there is timing to maximize, such as what is popular in the media, and items not so popular, such as an adult child not being a dependent for 2020 (but not filing until potential EIP 3 is paid, so the parents get the "dependent" amount, which does not have to be paid back, then the adult child files to get their EIP 1, 2, and eventually 3). No moral issues, as it is something done all the time, like bundling income and/or expenses for the best benefit. 1 Quote
Lee B Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 Yeah I have seen multiple articles. Generally I try to avoid discussing potential legislation unless it's fairly far along. This leigislation still has a long ways to go. 2 Quote
WITAXLADY Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 but how does that dependent amount work as there is not credit for over age 17? Is that part of the new stimulus? D from the great north WI Quote
Medlin Software, Dennis Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 The proposed EIP 3 may give an amount for dependents over 16yo, unlike EIP 1 and 2. Still speculation, but there is no point filing early and losing what may be a gain. Example: Parents and one adult dependent (for the sake of this example, a disabled adult) Parents: EIP 1 and EIP 2, nothing for adult dependent. Parents elect not to claim dependency for 2020 (-500 federal, and for sake of example, -300 state), making adult child eligible to file and receive EIP 1 and 2 (+1800). If EIP 3 passes as proposed (1400, adult dependents eligible): Wait to file until EIP 3 is paid. Parents receive their own, plus 1400 for the adult dependent from prior qualifying TY. Parents then file, without dependent, and because there is no claw or pay back requirement, keep the 1400. Adult (the parents child) files, and receives their EIP 1, EIP 2. Likely for 2021, the child files separately again, to get EIP 3. With the proposed EIP 3, the net: Parents, +1400 EIP 3 for 2019 adult dependent, less 1600 for loss of credits on their 20 and 21 returns. Child, +1800 for EIP 1 and 2 (20 return) and EIP 3 of 1400 on 21 return. Parents, - 200, Child +3200, net +3000. --- Disregarding EIP 3: Parents -800 (20), Child +1800 (20), net +1000 1 Quote
WITAXLADY Posted February 23, 2021 Report Posted February 23, 2021 mine was my son who now makes over $75,000 - he is waiting... 1 Quote
ETax847 Posted February 24, 2021 Report Posted February 24, 2021 This is a tough one. Some folks need their refund so are torn if they should wait for something that may or not happen. Very interesting predicament to say the least. Quote
JohnH Posted February 24, 2021 Author Report Posted February 24, 2021 Yes, an interesting predicament. I'm just laying out the scenario where it applies and telling them to let me know whether they want to file a Federal extension or "just go for it" as things are right now. One thing I'm not going to do is hold onto the returns waiting for IRS or Congress to extend the filing date. If the client want to wait, then an extension goes out immediately. Once their info is in my hands, I either want it out the door on the first pass or send in an extension. (Less stressful for me that way). 1 Quote
HV Ken Posted February 24, 2021 Report Posted February 24, 2021 Paper the file the return. That will build in a big enough delay! Quote
Lee B Posted March 4, 2021 Report Posted March 4, 2021 The White House has reached a compromise with the moderate Democrats in the Senate. The compromise phaseout range for for MFJ would be $ 150,000 to $ 160,00 and MFS $75,000 to $ 80,000. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.