Jump to content
ATX Community

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am reading up on this provision, and I am a little confused (Yes Jack, I know the ink isn't dry yet, can we dispense with that post).  

It says that the owner of a pass through may deduct 20% of the income generated from the business.  OK, that works.  Limited to 315K of income if it is a professional service company.  I get that too.  Then it goes into a 50% limitation on the W2 income.  This is where I get confused.

Lets say my client owns an engineering firm taxed as an S Corp.  He takes a salary of 150K per year as President.   At the end of the year, after taking his salary into consideration, he has 200K of income from the business.   I think he gets a 40K deduction?   And that 40K is less than 50% of his W2 salary, so we are good.

Change the salary to 50K though, which makes his Pass Through Income go up to 300K, and he only gets to take a 25K deduction because of the W2 Wage limitation.

Now lets make him a Sole Proprietor.  He has no salary, his income is now 350K, and he gets no deduction because he does not have W2 salary from the business and his pass through income exceeds the threshold. 

Is this correct on how this works?

Thanks in advance.

Tom
Modesto, CA

Posted

O K, I read the bill carefully and if the Qualified Business Income is under the Threshold Amount of MFS $ 157,500 or MFJ $ 315,000

then the limitation of 50 % of the W -2 Income is not applied. Therefore a SP with Qualified Income under the Threshold Amount would get a 20 % deduction.

For S Corp there are special anti-abuse rules that would prevent an S Corp owner from taking this deduction if he took $ 0 wages.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, cbslee said:

O K, I read the bill carefully and if the Qualified Business Income is under the Threshold Amount of MFS $ 157,500 or MFJ $ 315,000

then the limitation of 50 % of the W -2 Income is not applied. Therefore a SP with Qualified Income under the Threshold Amount would get a 20 % deduction.

For S Corp there are special anti-abuse rules that would prevent an S Corp owner from taking this deduction if he took $ 0 wages.

OK, that makes sense.   And if it works like the DPAD, I can get my head around that.  I have played with that one before.

What about the SP with Qualified income OVER the threshold?   There must be something in there that gives relief?  If the guy in my example makes 350K, he is SOL?  Sounds counter-intuitive. 

Thanks

Tom
Modesto, CA

Posted

Once passed I will need to review this carefully. For Schedule C filers I am wondering if the 20% is deducted from the Schedule C. I rather doubt they will allow this as the owner would also reduce his SE tax on the 20%.

Posted
23 hours ago, Christian said:

Once passed I will need to review this carefully. For Schedule C filers I am wondering if the 20% is deducted from the Schedule C. I rather doubt they will allow this as the owner would also reduce his SE tax on the 20%.

Do they really consider Sch Cs a pass-thru entity?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...