Jump to content
ATX Community

Recommended Posts

Posted

My understanding is with multiple IRA accounts, the minimum distribution must be calculated on each account.  But the actual distribution (total of minimum amount on all accounts) may be distributed out of only one of the accounts.  Has anyone experienced a problem when this is done this way?  That is, IRS letters assessing penalties for no distributions on the other accounts.  I would assume the IRS would trace the ssn from all accounts and realize the distribution from the one account covers all the accounts.  But I'm wondering if that is so and would there be a need for follow-up letters and explanations, copies of statements, etc. to clear things up.

 

 

Posted

http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Retirement-Plans-FAQs-regarding-Required-Minimum-Distributions#4

According to the IRS, the RMD is to be calculated on each account separately but can then take the year's distribution all from one account.  Specifically see the sections "How is the amount of the required minimum distribution calculated?" and the next one after that labeled "Can an account owner just take a RMD from one account instead of separately from each account?" where it says:

An IRA owner must calculate the RMD separately for each IRA that he or she owns, but can withdraw the total amount from one or more of the IRAs. Similarly, a 403(b) contract owner must calculate the RMD separately for each 403(b) contract that he or she owns, but can take the total amount from one or more of the 403(b) contracts. However, RMDs required from other types of retirement plans, such as 401(k) and 457(b) plans have to be taken separately from each of those plan accounts.

  • Like 3
Posted

Adding to the above, it's separate for each account because the beneficiaries can vary and might not be the same for all of the IRAs that the account holder has, and so the life expectancy and table used to calc the RMD may vary from one IRA to the next.

Choose the life expectancy table to use based on your situation. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Randall, to answer your original question, I've never had a letter for any client that chose to take distributions all from one account except the year that one client completely missed taking a distribution altogether.

Posted

The IRS does not monitor the balances in IRA, 401K, 503B etc. accounts.

Jack, could you elaborate on that?  I thought (at least by computer), they may compare 5498s, 1099Rs matched to one's ssn and age.

Really?  Please tell me one instance where the IRS set a notice about not taking RMD?  The IRS cannot even match 5498s for IRA transfers.  The IRS has not the time, resources nor the will to monitor multiple millions of retirement accounts. 

Remember: Our tax system is an honor system....

Posted

It might be easier than it first appears if they just go for the low-hanging fruit.  They know when the taxpayerr reaches 70, and they have the 5498's each year.  So beginnning at 71, the computer could just generate a CP notice for anyone who doesn't report a distribution,  leaving it up to the taxpayer to prove there is basis or that it's a Roth. More or less how they handle 1099-B presently.   There will be plenty of people who will just pay up and hope the problem goes away. 

  • Like 1
Posted

It might be easier than it first appears if they just go for the low-hanging fruit.  They know when the taxpayerr reaches 70, and they have the 5498's each year.  So beginnning at 71, the computer could just generate a CP notice for anyone who doesn't report a distribution,  leaving it up to the taxpayer to prove there is basis or that it's a Roth. More or less how they handle 1099-B presently.   There will be plenty of people who will just pay up and hope the problem goes away. 

Does anyone have an example of this happening?  IRS fear mongering...

Posted

H-m-m.  I would have thought that the use of the words "might", 'if, "could", and the general context of the conversation make it clear that this is speculative.  Guess I need to hone up on my writing  skills,. Or I could ignore  the noise and not  waste time trying to reduce all my thoughts to the lowest  common denominator.

  • Like 4
Posted

JohnH, your post was totally clear.  And yes, that is how they seem to handle 1099-B's, so it's logical that they may start doing the same thing with RMDs.  Would not surprise me, I'm just surprised they have not been doing it that way already.

Posted (edited)

If the NY Public Library (a highly respected government agency), can after 20 years, find Jerry Seinfeld for not returning "Tropic of Cancer", who knows how many Mr. Bookmans there are in the IRS (another highly respected government agency), looking for  ways to get those missed and overdue taxes and penalties. 

I guess one never really knows.

Edited by FDNY
  • Like 1
Posted

What if one of the IRA accounts is an Annuity Contract IRA (traditional) and the other is a brokerage IRA account?

 

Then there is no other option than to jump off a bridge...

Actually, I think it works the same except if the annuity has been annuitized you *have* to take the annual distribution amount they give, and make up any deficit with the other.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...