Jump to content
ATX Community

Recommended Posts

Posted

Efiling is unlimited.  You get three users for free but you pay for each user above three.  You have a per office fee and your user packs are not transferable.

Depending on the pricing this might save me money. I need 5 users so I have to pay about $600 fox Max package every year. If they price additional users at anything less than 300/ea, I will save.

Posted

Efiling is unlimited.  You get three users for free but you pay for each user above three.  You have a per office fee and your user packs are not transferable.

This is the current model for ATX MAX.  Post your source or ask the admin to remove the thread.

  • Like 1
Posted

We have been able to install ATX on three machines for some time now with no extra cost.  I have no issues with that.  We don't need to be scared out of our wits at this point in the tax season.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

xxxxx  comment hidden  xxxxx

 

I don't get this comment.  I've been a long time user of ATX.  It's slow but I think that's the type of programming it uses.  I haven't had the problems others have had, returns not opening or whatever.  Something must be going on unique with them.

Edited by kcjenkins
  • Like 5
Posted

I don't get this comment.  I've been a long time user of ATX.  It's slow but I think that's the type of programming it uses.  I haven't had the problems others have had, returns not opening or whatever.  Something must be going on unique with them.

DITTO!!!

  • Like 2
Posted

Renewal already? I didn't get mine yet. Where is this pricing detail, anyway? Why am I so out of the loop (sniff, sniff)?

 

It popped up when I logged into the ATX site.

Posted

Too bad. This was one of my suggestions. I think it's wrong to have a 1-3 pack and a 4 to infinity pack. I wanted them to add a 4-7 pack, an 8-10 pack, etc. I feel like I'm really overpaying for the extra 2 users I need. Oh well.

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree, JM, it would make good marketing sense to sell at least one more intermediate size, say 4-9, for a price between the two current options.  In the 'old days', ATX would have listened to a good presentation, but sadly, CCH just does not seem to listen to much of anything.  

Posted

I agree, JM, it would make good marketing sense to sell at least one more intermediate size, say 4-9, for a price between the two current options.  In the 'old days', ATX would have listened to a good presentation, but sadly, CCH just does not seem to listen to much of anything.  

 

And we all know companies analyze their customer bases to maximize its profits based on criteria such as this, and that is probably why they have 3 users built in to the base price, knowing that there are those with 4 preparers so that they can tack on that extra charge for.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

When I first read this, I thought the OP was about individual returns no longer being unlimited, that it was going to something like a PPR program.  This is a misleading post and I think it should be retitled by the moderators.  It should be more reflective of what they may be doing, which is possibly adding more steps in the number of users to the pricing.

 

Tom

Newark, CA

Edited by BulldogTom

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...