SunTaxMan Posted February 5, 2008 Report Posted February 5, 2008 At one of the Gear-Up seminars this year, the speaker mentioned "good practice" in the Tax Preparation office is to ask clients who have contractors to require I-9 completion for all independent contractors, as well as employees. If I remember the rationale, it was so that IF IRS would ever reclassify contractors as employees, the I-9s would be completed and on file. I don't remember the speaker saying, or even hinting, that INS is enforcing, or even hinting at enforcing, I-9s for 1099 recipients. Comments? SECOND ISSUE. This same speaker recommended issuing 1099s to ALL contractors, not just those who cross the $600 threshhold. Comments? Quote
SunTaxMan Posted February 6, 2008 Author Report Posted February 6, 2008 I am surprised..... No one is going to even comment on either suggestion? Quote
zeke Posted February 6, 2008 Report Posted February 6, 2008 The same rational can be used to suggest 1099 to corps because one may be improperly formed, or disolved... I suspect that banks report 1099-int info under $10 even tho not required. I will make a reasonable attempt to follow the law & regulations, but I refuse to become paranoid. Quote
MAMalody Posted February 6, 2008 Report Posted February 6, 2008 The I-9 is not an issue. You do what is required. If not an employee, don't do it. On the 1099Misc for all whether over $600 or not, I recommend that to my clients. While not required, I simply think it is easier to do them all instead of try to sort them out an it adds a "little" validity their deduction for contractors. These are for my Schedule C clients, I don't do parts and corps. Also I seldom have a Schedule C that grosses more that $150K. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.