-
Posts
4,279 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
226
Everything posted by JohnH
-
Well that's easy for you to say, but I'm finding that monitors just don't last all that long. It's getting expensive to keep replacing them every week or so. After a few days all the White-Out already makes them hard to read, and now you're telling me to make a bigger mess with rubber stamps.
-
Thanks Jack. I found that my printers all have that capability as well. I tried jainen's approach, but every time I try to attach the rubber stamp to an email, it falls off the keyboard into the floor.
-
I don't know how to mark a return "Draft" other than to write the words on each page & scan it. If there's a way within ATX, I'd like to know as well. But if you want to watermark each page as "Client Copy", then all you need to do is select "Print", select "Preferences" from within the Print Manager, and under the "Print" tab on the left hand side, be sure that "Print Watermark on Client Copy" is selected. Then under "Options" you select "Client Copy". This will display a second column and you can check the appropriate forms/pages you want to print. Each page will have "Client Copy" watermarked across its face.
-
I know TaxSlayer may be a bit of a nuisance to some of us, but I think they have the best marketing program of any software provider out there. I admire their tenacity. It's low-key but persistent; a difficult balance to maintain when marketing to professionals. I've evaluated their software and from what I've seen they would probably be just below Drake in my order of choices if I ever left ATX. It isn't likely to happen, but if they developed a true forms-based product they'd probably jump ahead of Drake. They keep themselves especially well-positioned to pick off tax preparers who are disgruntled with their current provider. They seem to be anticipating that sort of thing happening on a wholesale basis in the future. Anyone besides me wonder why they think that way...?
-
Too much information.
-
Since time is an important issue for you, it might be a good idea to try and accelerate the date for the biopsy. If you explain the situation, they may be able to accommodate you by squeezing you in earlier. You might also try to get on a "wait list" in case they have a cancellation. I've had a couple of medical situations in which I'd work out arrangements with the appointments secretary to call them every morning just to ask if they had a cancellation for that day. (In one case I would just delay eating until I had made the call). The last thing you need is a tight schedule for making an important decision like this, so getting an earlier answer might take some pressure off. And hope all goes well with your biopsy.
-
Kea: I don't have a specific agent or company recommendation, but I want to make a general suggestion. I've been concerned for the past couple of years that my wife's insurance carrier might drop spousal coverage altogether (she's a retired NC employee), so this subject has been on my radar screen for quite a while. If I ever have to make the leap, I'm leaning in the direction of a Health Savings Account rather than traditional insurance. There's still the matter of selecting a good carrier for the Major Medical portion, but as fo0r the overall concept the HSA seems to be a good alternative to traditional coverage since an individual or small group really doesn't have any leverage with the insurance companies.
-
Jack: I don't know why you would say that. After all, Turbo Tax did a fine job for the current Treasury Secretary. It even got him off the hook for penalties.
-
Would that potentially create any sort of privacy issue? :)
-
I agree completely. The discounts offered aren't worth the risks associated with renewing early, especially since most of the vendors are clearly in the mode of doing what's best for them without any regard for how it impacts their customers. They've adopted the business model of the banks - just keep getting bigger and don't worry too much about the fallout. It's easy enough to mouth the right words in carefully contructed language during the early part of the transition and then make your most egregious cost-cutting & reduction-of-service moves after the majority of your customers have been lulled to sleep. Most will stay, some will leave, and some we will get back in the next acquisition. In the end it all evens out.
-
I think this would fit on a post card: Dear Clients: The administration meant well, but frankly they don't really know what they're doing. The way this credit is being handled is a hopeless mess for some of you. Be prepared to pay next year, unless you want to pay me as much to figure out the correct withholding as I normally charge to prepare your return. And remember that no matter how you fare in 2009, you will definitely be paying more in the coming years. This will result from a combination of: 1) Increased tax rates, or 2) Record-setting inflation resulting from irresponsible & irrational government spending.
-
Sometimes you just have to tell the client the system may not meet their definition of fair, but it is what it is and there's nothing to be done about it. If they are so irrational that they can't accept that simple fact, then maybe you're better off without them wasting your time.
-
I'd be inclined to do it the IRS way. The small P&I reduction for the May payment won't be worth the hassle if IRS fails to credit the payment properly. Wait until the first notice arrives before making a payment, so IRS will have a piece of paperwork to match up with the check. The client can always send MORE with the June payment (even double up on it), if they choose to do so.
-
Best way to correct incorrect value for prior year asset?
JohnH replied to David's topic in General Chat
To expand the question a bit, does IRS even compare balance sheet entries year-over-year? I don't think so because I've seen returns with some pretty big discrepancies between the ending balance sheet for the return actually filed in the prior year and the beginning amounts for the return filed in a subsequent year. So I don't think the question would ever come up unless there was an audit, and then you could probably just trot out the old "de minimis" argument (provided it's true, of course). -
Maybe now you'll stay away from those sites you shouldn't be viewing.. Seriously, glad you got it resolved - it could happen to any of us with just an inadvertent click of the mouse at the wrong time.
-
Thanks Eric. That's pretty neat. Does it matter how far away I stand when looking at the chart? (I think it's telling me my vision is 20/80)
-
Probably one of those clients who just wanted to "get it done" without thinking through the consequences. Then they come back expecting the preparer to straighten out their mess after they're past the point of no return.
-
Margaret: I was referring to getting burned in the larger context - the overarching principles of the company under CCH management. Not to keep rehashing old grudges, but they clearly told us something about their new business philosophy when they yanked the original community at the worst possible moment without any regard for their loyal users. The clear message was they intended to do what was in their best interests regardless of how it impacted their customers - they told us that with both their words and their deeds. So far, that's the only major hiccup as far as I'm concerned, but we clearly know what & whom we are dealing with. I follow the old Russian proverb that says when dancing with a bear, keep your knife handy. For me, that means I'm not making any type of commitment until I'm sure the product and service meets my needs for the upcoming year. I'll pay extra to know that's the case. As long as their interests and mine coincide I'll be a customer. But if we get to the point that their business doesn't serve my needs in terms of price, service, quality, etc, then I'll move on without ever looking back.
-
What's the rush? One never know what ugly surprises any software vendor could toss out at the last minute. It isn't as though we all haven't been burned before on one way or another, so I think it's wise to wait until the last minute to buy any tax software in this environment. The relatively small discounts they offer for buying early just aren't worth the risk.
-
Yes, it is probably down for maintenance due to too much formation of rust.
-
Multiple monitors help as well. I have the display set on one monitor to a larger size for those times when I need it, and another monitor at a different size when I want to cram as much of a large spreadsheet as possible onto it. The I just drag whatever I'm working on to the most convenient monitor. But Chrome does also look interesting.
-
You mean like the client who closes on a rental property and then calls the next day to ask "Can you recommend someone to be a Qualified Intermediary for me? I want to do one of those Like-Kind Exchanges you told me about."
-
One of my clients who always pays more than the bill is one of our pastors. When he sends his check, he generally adds about 60% to whatever I charged him. Of course, I always add that much or more to my next church offering, so it just goes round & round.
-
Given all the money that everyone is saving, and since the info originated on this forum, it might be a good time to put in a gentle reminder to all that the "Donate" button is at the top of the page. We want to be sure this resource stays well-funded...
-
I will likely buy from TRX, but following my usual practice I'm not committing a penny until Dec (or maybe even Jan 2010). Seems like buying the ATX software form TRX is the logical choice, assuming I decide to stay with ATX in the first place. My overall approach is that there's just too much uncertainty out there with virtually all the vendors to make any commitments until the last minute. I'm not going to risk making a wrong decision simply to save what amounts to the price of one or two tax returns. I'll wait until the vendors can prove that what they offer will work for me, then I'll pay.