-
Posts
7,674 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
497
Everything posted by Catherine
-
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
THIS!!! STOP IT. STOP IT RIGHT NOW. If you don't take care of yourself, you will burn out and get stress illnesses. I came to this realization some years ago and stopped working one day a week. Usually, but not always, Sunday. Found out that if I took a day for myself I got more done the other six days than in uninterrupted seven without end. Any client who expects instant response any day or any time of day is a client who does not respect us and who is definitely under-paying us. For me, if you want 24/7 instant response, you had better be be a close family member. Anyone else gets me as I choose to respond. If they don't like that, they can go down the street to someone else, and (likely) pay more for poorer-quality work. -
The IRS will take money from ANYONE - taxpayer, personal rep, executor, neighbor, friend, dog-catcher. All they need is a valid check (or bank account, for direct debit) and the tp's ssn in the memo field. As for refunds - even then, they'll send money to anyone who requests it with Form 1310 properly filled out. Even before court appointments, if you check the boxes promising to be good and give the money out in accordance with state law, they'll send it. But whether it be a check or a deposit, that will need an account, and that requires more hoops (estate ein, appointment of representative, etc).
-
I always refer to it as auto-UNcorrect. And yes, I've had some "corrections" that resulted in the same laugh-until-tears upon reading what it thought was better than what I wrote. No good examples off the top of my head, but there sure have been some doozies!
-
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
Me, too, but an amazing number have NOT. We got a lot of panicked calls and email on the 15th wanting to know what needed to be done for extensions... -
One client called in a panic that her payment didn't go through (1040 pmt) and I had her call. They told her there were delays (no specifics got back to me, at least) but that they'd get them all eventually.
-
We've been using Verifyle for signatures and secure email. I get that free as an NAEA member. People generally find it easy to use, too, although getting sig's for married couples isn't nearly as easy as it was using Signature Flow (from CPAperless, now discontinued, doggone it).
-
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
We have a good couple hundred in the hopper (for many of which we have no documents whatsoever, yet - and we could have told you who those clients would be back on Jan 2nd). MA still has given us NO guidance on how to apply their cockamamie rules for the UI exclusion to blended households, dependents (either direction - include with parent, include parents with them), and other oddball situations. Clients for whom we can file need absolutely ludicrous amounts of explanation why X counted but Y did not, and more. I think I've approved THREE returns for e-file in the last TWO WEEKS. (Not counting a couple of extensions filed.) Three! It should be three before lunch, three after lunch, three between dinner and closing down for the night, rinse and repeat. -
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
No major (retroactive!) tax law changes for them. No such excuse for estimates; without completed returns it's a total guesstimate instead of a calculation. They did not think. No surprise there. -
As soon as the giver said "I should have sent a 1099-NEC" it turned into self-employment on Sch C. The good news is that she can now deduct her mileage to and from, and any out of pocket expenses.
-
Scholarship as income to take AOC - not passing the sniff test
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
Not quite. Had a client who took a course in eastern Europe. Accredited college, but not on the US list, so we couldn't even take lifetime learning credit. -
Scholarship as income to take AOC - not passing the sniff test
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
As long as she paid a school in the USA, yes. If she paid a foreign school, then it depends on whether or not they're - I forget the term, registered, qualified, something - with the US Dept of Ed. -
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
One guy yesterday had a zillion questions on why they owe so much. Gee, he cut back his ES payments but his income was up $60K, I wonder why they might owe money? Thought I had him settled, then today he started in on more questions. I haven't opened any email from him since before lunch because I'm too close to telling him I don't care about his stupid questions, just figure out how you're gonna pay and just. shut. up. -
Is anyone else behind? I'm feeling like a loser.
Catherine replied to jasdlm's topic in General Chat
But company does not reciprocate. LOL. We are SO far behind. We lost multiple weeks this year with the retroactive changes (and belated state changes) and the panicking clients needed sedation by phone and email. Plus waiting for software updates, then going back to look at returns untouched for so long we had no memory of what was still to be done, what was finished, what we should expect to see... Worse yet, I have absolutely NO patience anymore for any clients. I've caught myself ready to chew someone's head off, more than once just barely before the words left my mouth. I am so unutterably DONE with this season. Realized this morning that I had not even looked at my own Q1 ES payments (what they should be, or scheduling them), and what's worse, I really don't give a flying bleep at a rolling donut either. I'll get to it in a week or two or three. Whatever. -
Square works well but has some oddball quirks. Dump the whole account and set up a brand new one will be the only way to fix this.
-
Yes, it's an installment sale.
-
And yet one of our clients got an NOD because Appeals has NOT seen fit to act on the full response sent in back in November of last year! He's self-filing a tax court petition and I'll take over again once the TC sends it back to Appeals with a spanking to settle the thing. It's a dead-simple response, too; two corrections, one they were right about and one they were wrong about.
-
Most places sell for 90-110% of one year's gross receipts, frequently paid as 1/3 of receipts from transferred clients per year for three years (plus additional if you work for the new firm, hourly or whatever). The idea being that clients are more likely to stay with the new firm if you are seen to still be involved, and you get paid more for clients that stay.
-
What I do is enter it on two lines: 1. "personal transactions $x" followed by 2. "personal transactions $(x-1)" so the info ends up showing $1 taxable income. Why add taxable income? Because a lot of detail fields don't transmit if there is $0 total. Leave in the $1 and they get the details. Many states require 1099-K be explained.
-
Simple! If we make a mistake, it's our fault. If they make a mistake, it's still our fault! Just keep that in mind and it all falls into place.
-
I've seen applied refunds get messed up, too (yes, with e-filed returns). I DETEST applying refunds forward. Let each year stand on its own - else a problem with one year then involves a second year and doubles the problems that need fixing. That said, on rare occasion it's the best option for specific reasons.
-
Since when has that small fact stopped them! Eventually, yes. Had a battle royale with the IRS some years ago when they had a payment that was not properly applied (by them!) and they were getting nasty about late payment penalties. We had the cashed-check copy clearly showing the right year and quarter in the memo field, yet the IRS still fought and fought hard. Had to go to a supervisor! That person cleared it up instantly, and I hope the agent got reamed a new one for causing a couple of weeks of trouble.
-
Have you actually met all your clients in person?
Catherine replied to Yardley CPA's topic in General Chat
I've prayed with clients, held them as they sobbed, helped them handle their deceased friend's/relatives' estate, rejoiced with them over kids' graduations and weddings, and more. I've had clients tell me, "I've told you things I haven't told my therapist." In some regards, we are more ministers than financial professionals. Yes, there are good tax pros all over (this group is a great example of just that!) and I've made inquiries, at times, for clients moving who want someone local. And gotten referrals from here from others in the same boat. But there are also plenty who move and want to stay with us - the history, familiarity with how we work, already have the file portal account and know how to use it, etc - and we don't refuse them. And a few who mean to change, then at the last minute come back to the familiar "for now" and some of those eventually leave. But we certainly end up knowing them better, in many ways, than just about any other professional they deal with. -
Have you actually met all your clients in person?
Catherine replied to Yardley CPA's topic in General Chat
I've met almost all of them. There are a few I haven't met - some of whom I've been doing their taxes for more than a decade. -
Dunno about ATX, but Drake has a checkbox on the 1099-R form to EXCLUDE from regular reporting because it's reported on the 8915-E. Perhaps there is a similar checkbox/election/entry in ATX?
-
I searched goggle (sic) and the NYS tax dept and found nothing on that code. Obviously, it's one of those "if we tell you, we have to kill you" codes that no one knows. Put it in as "other" and you should be fine. Those are almost always informational only, anyway.