DANRVAN

That's where the real estate lawyer comes in. In substance, it I agree with Ron, looks like an installment sale poorly drafted by without legal or tax advice. So what exactly is the option available for exercise by the tenant?

Treat it as a repo on installment sale.

No, it does not sound right. I believe it has to be either a lease or a purchase, but can't be both at the same time. Whether it is a lease or purchase depends on the facts and circumstances including: -intent of parties -payments are above fmv of rent -who bears rights and risk of ownership -who pays insurance, property taxes -is renter building equity -property can be purchased by exercising an option that is nominal compared to the fmv of the property.

Not enough information given. Did section 1038 apply to repo? (Sounds like it did). If so basis equals: (1) basis of note at time of repo (2) + gain recognized on repo (3) + repo expense see examples at Reg 1.1038-1

I am leaning towards thesitefactory.com, they have a specialized format for accountants and taxpo's, looks like it can be easily customized and cost $16.25 per month. Looks like a good starter kit for now.

Thanks for sharing that Lion. One thing I notice on your home page is that the tabs on the top are hard to read. Maybe it is my screen, but the tabs are almost shaded out in the dark green border.

The student is subject to FICA whether working as employee or contractor since obviously worked on a regular continual basis, despite the fact he was trying to earn tuition. There are a few exceptions I am aware of including 4 year med student, that doesn't seem to be the case here. Also some exception for foreign students. The only option is challenge the university with SS-8.

Thanks for the info Catherine, your website looks great!

Thanks for the info Lion, I didn't see a price on their website, can you tell me about how much it runs?

Thanks for the info FDYN.

I am going to set up a website, can anyone here give me some ideas on a source? Thanks for any suggestions you might have. Dan

I got the impression that this was an advance to help cover his moving expenses and not a reimbursement, and therefore taxable as wages per Rev. Ruling 68-239.

I agree, advances for future services are wages, taxable in the year received, see Rev. Ruling 68-239, Letter Ruling 200040004, and tax court case of Beaver Anson.

Thanks to both of you.

Oregon requires a txt file for submitting W-2's while the ATX version is asc. Does anyone here know how to convert from ASC to TXT. I googled some ideas but haven't tried any yet.

Comes as a surprise Elrod. I have enjoyed your wit and humor on this board, including the hilarious pictures of your "Family Reunion" a couple of years ago you posted for us as we were going into the countdown to April 15. I hope your departure is not due to any serous health or other issues. Wish you well and may God Bless you!

I am right handed but taught myself to run the mouse with my left hand. It save me time when inputting data. By doing so, I can keep my right hand on the number keys and move from line to line or cell to cell with the left hand. I am so used to it that it confuses me when I sit at somebody's computer which has the mouse sitting on the right hand side of the keyboard.

There is no tax on transfer of trust corpus to the beneficiary.

The problem was the agent did not applying the tax laws properly and the taxpayer did not use the proper channels to resolve it. I have dealt in situations where two divorced taxpayers try to claim the dependent. I have been told and come to believe that the agent often will take the side of the mother. I have also found it is a waste of time to make phone calls in these matters. Your client took it in his own hands so you did not have the opportunity to make written responses in a timely manner. The fact that the client blotched 2014 by not going through the proper channels will have no bearing on a favorable determination for 2016. I believe form 12203 needed to be filed before the notice of deficiency was sent out on October 4th, but you should get a written notice saying whether it was accepted or not. The time to file form 12203 is before the notice of deficiency (90 day letter) is sent out. If the tax court petition had been filed on time, the case would have gone before an appeals officer in an attempt to resolve it before going to court. I recently resolved a client's case at that level where his ex had also claimed the dependents. There is no basis for amending 2013 and 2015 as I understand they are not covered by the 8332. The fact that an agent did not properly apply tax law for 2014 does not mean the IRS will follow that position in future years. It looks like your client might be out $4,900 for 2014, (lost refund of $3,300 and balance due of $1,600). I don't know how the taxpayer advocate can help if client did not act in a timely manner. If it's worth that amount for 2016, your client should go ahead and take the exemption and go through the proper channels to get a proper determination for that year. You do not need a "final determination' for 2014 to file for 2016. Just take a fresh shot at it. Please keep us posted on this, but it sounds to me like the client missed his opportunity for an appeal by filing 12203 late and then missed the tax court petition deadline. It will be interesting to hear what the TA has to say, but I don't think she can help if statutory deadlines were missed.

The instructions say to input the taxable income and tax for the specific base year. So if he was not required to file in 2012, I would leave that part blank. Due to the mathematical maze of Schedule J, he might end up with little or no savings since he is not jumping up into a high income tax bracket. And if he does, I am not aware of anything in the code that says he is not entitled to it. Reg 1.1301-1(b)(1)(iv) clearly states that the taxpayer does not need to be engaged in farming in the base years.

Why would you amend 2013 and 2015? Not following you on that part. In regards to 2016, I would file and claim it since client is entitled to it. The sooner the better to get the process started and get the issue before an appeals officer if needed. Maybe you will end up with a better agent to work with and won't have to go that far. Maybe ex-girl friend will not even claim for 2016. Maybe client learned his lesson and will allow you to handle it in a timely matter. Maybe you will get a favorable determination for 2016 before IRS closes the case for 2014. Good luck, Dan

Have you looked at the instructions to Schedule J? I don't think you have to be a farmer in the base years.

So sounds like mother filed, claimed daughter and triggered audit. Client has 8332 which would give him exemption, unless 8332 was revoked. In that case mother would have to attached a revoked 8332 to her return. The revocation would have to be made before 12/31/13. She is also required to keep proof of delivery to noncustodial parent or proof that reasonable attempt was made to deliver. Without knowing what communications you have had, I would write a letter to the IRS addressing the above issues and stress that your client has met all the requirements for claiming his daughter per Reg. Sec. 1.152-4(b)(3)(I), in absence of a timely revoked 8332 by the custodial parent per Reg. Sec. 1.152-4(e)(3)(i)-(iii). Hopefully the TA will pick up on this as well, or maybe it needs to be brought to her attention. You mentioned in your other thread form 12203 has been filed. I don't know if it will be considered since the notice of statutory deficiency was already sent out at that point. Hope this all work out, but ultimately client is responsible for taking it on himself and waiting until he got over his head.

Not sure what the issue is. So ex wife is custodial parent and signed 8332 for year 2014 which was timely filed by your client?

Just bumped this up as a reference for your current thread.